How do we avoid seeing what we want to see?

 Not all parallels are equal. We apply stricter standards than “interesting similarities.”

We consider a connection stronger when several of the following are present:

• Multiple characters independently reflecting the same gospel event structure (not a single isolated example)
   
• Clear internal structure
  Kanji composed of radicals or components with stable, historically attested meanings
   
• Early or classical usage, where relevant
  Meanings attested before modern reinterpretation
   
• Narrative coherence
  The concept aligns naturally with the biblical storyline (prophecy → expectation → fulfillment, promise → suffering → exaltation), rather than forcing a match
   

These patterns tend to repeat, not just appear once.

We treat a connection as weak—or purely speculative—when it relies on:

• Vibes-based associations
  Visual resemblance or emotional resonance without linguistic grounding
   
• Modern meanings used to retrofit a point
  Especially when earlier usage contradicts the claim
   
• One-off coincidences
  Interesting, but not repeatable across multiple characters or themes
   

These may be noted, but they are never presented as strong evidence.

 Each Gospel Kanji episode follows the same basic workflow. This keeps the investigation transparent and reproducible.

We begin with a biblical theme, not a character.
Examples include messianic calling, expectation, suffering, sacrifice, redemption, or kingship.

We break the character down into its radicals or structural elements, rather than treating it as a single image.

We examine standard definitions, classical usage, and linguistic consensus—before applying any theological lens.

As an example, Messianic Patterns, a recurring focus in Season 3 is the contrast between:

• Expected Messiah (power, greatness, triumph)
   
• Suffering Messiah (rejection, humility, sacrifice)
   

We ask whether the structure of the character reflects this tension in a way that aligns with Scripture.

After the entirety of the "gospel kanji library" has been put on display, each finding will eventually be clearly labeled as:

• Strong
   
• Moderate
   
• Speculative
   

Speculation is never disguised as certainty.

 To avoid overstating the case, we draw firm lines around what this project does not claim.

• We do not claim this proves Christianity
   
• We do not build doctrine from Kanji
   
• We do not treat speculation as fact
   

Scripture remains primary. Kanji, at most, function as historical or cultural artifacts—possible witnesses, not authorities.

 The goal is not to win an argument, but to ask a historically grounded question:

If the gospel truly went out to the ends of the earth, what traces might that leave behind?

This project invites careful readers to examine that question without abandoning rigor, humility, or respect for the biblical text.

 Read the FAQ: Hard Questions

Where we address common objections, alternative explanations, and the strongest critiques head-on.